Babytree Group plans $1bn Hong Kong initial public offering
The China-based online parenting company, Babytree Group, is planning to raise up to $1bn in a Hong Kong initial public offering (IPO), Reuters reports.
Babytree, who is backed by global e-commerce firm Alibaba Group, is hoping to raise between $800mn to $1bn from the IPO.
The company, who is also supported by Shanghai-based conglomerate Fosun International, is aiming to gain approval from the Hong Kong stock exchange’s listing committee by the end of September, according to Reuters’ sources.
The potential IPO is the latest in a busy Hong Kong calendar which is set to include a $4bn deal by Meituan Dianping, a online food delivery-to-ticketing services platform, in addition to a $1bn listing of Haidilao.
- Chinese karaoke solutions provider raises $29mn in series B round
- Facebook links up with La Liga to offer India free streaming of the league
- Nokia confirms appointment of Westcon-Comstor as distributor in the Phillippines
Towards the end of June, Babytree announced it was China’s biggest maternity and child-focused online community boasting on average 139mn monthly active users in 2017.
Having been first established in 2007, Babytree has rolled out other services such as its Babytree parenting mobile app as well as its Meitun Mama.
As of the end of 2017, it is thought that Babytree has connected 338 advertising clients and 2,253 third-party e-commerce vendors.
Q&A: Professor Loredana Padurean, Asia School of Business
As someone who is creating Asia Pacific’s business leaders of the future, what do you believe are the essential skills leaders require?
In many ways, we need leaders who are Renaissance women/men or polymaths, as opposed to specialists of an industry or a field. A polymath is a person with profound knowledge, proficiency and expertise in multiple fields and today’s leaders have to be able to combine various ideas, look at problems in novel and useful ways, and develop a broad and yet still deep set of skills, talents, and knowledge.
You’ve coined ‘smart’ and ‘sharp’ as skills of the future. What are these?
They are replacements for ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ skills, a concept coined by a US Army doctor in 1972 who observed that his pupils had different skills: dealing with machinery required ‘hard’ skills, while dealing with people and paper were ‘soft’ skills. This concept has served us well since, but I find it too binary, not to mention the semantic implications of the words themselves.
Soft implies gentle, delicate, mild, quiet, tender, weak. However, there is nothing soft in navigating competing perspectives and cultures, handling and delivering critical feedback or dealing with office politics. Instead, I prefer to call these skills ‘smart’. Hard implies rigid, difficult, heavy, static. But how can we think of engineering or software development as static or rigid? I believe ‘sharp’ is more apt as such skills need constant updating or sharpening.
I think it’s time to reflect on these classifications, because we can drastically change someone’s perspective by how we choose to talk about and frame something.
How important are smart skills in leadership today?
Smart skills are more important than ever because we live in a world of extreme diversity: generational, ethical, value-based, gender, etc. Gone are the days when giving an order was an effective act of leadership. I personally work with people from five different continents and across five different generations, therefore as leaders, we need to know how to adapt, motivate, inspire and connect. We need to increase our investment in learning about them in action, especially as smart skills are more difficult to develop.
I believe that a successful leader today has to be both smart and sharp. Take cognitive readiness, one of my top 10 smart skills. In order to be cognitive ready, one has to master system dynamics, one of my top 10 sharp skills. Also, did you know that one of the primary reasons why digital transformation fails is not the absence of digital literacy, a sharp skill, but the need for more validation and adaptability, both smart skills. So, instead of thinking of these skills as binary, I prefer to think of them as the yin and yang; co-existing and complementing each other.
So, you can teach leaders smart skills then?
Yes, you can, via a combination of the classroom experience, plus an action component supported by deeply embedded reflection. At ASB we call this Action Learning, and we teach it both in the MBA and in the executive programs. For example, in teaching a leader emotional maturity as a smart skill, first they need to learn what it is, and then act on it, before reflecting on what we did and how we did it. And then to repeat it, but this time with more expertise and awareness. It’s not easy, but that’s why my favourite mantra is ‘the job is easy, the people are not’.
Discover Professor Padurean's successful skills for a digital transformation here