Australia far more lenient on competition law breaches – OECD
An OECD report has found that average Australian penalties for competition law breaking are significantly lower than those imposed in other comparable OECD jurisdictions.
The OECD report, Pecuniary Penalties for Competition Law Infringements in Australia, which compared the penalties for companies which breach competition laws in Australia with the EU, the UK, Germany, Japan, Korea and the USA, was released this week.
This has prompted the country’s competition watchdog, the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC), to rethink its approach to penalising offending organisations.
- Aussie telcos are buying more broadband capacity from NBN – ACCC report
- BP’s plan to buy 531 Woolworths fuel stations opposed by ACCC
- Read the latest edition of ANZ’s Business Chief magazine
ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said: “The OECD report provides valuable insight and a vital point for debate and discussion about the future of penalties in the context of competition law enforcement in Australia.”
The report found that Australia is particularly lenient in comparison to other OECD countries when it comes to larger firms and long-standing anti-competitive activity, in some cases by a factor of more than 12.
OECD Economist Dr Sean Ennis said: “This difference does not prevent Australia from imposing substantial and deterrent sanctions for competition law violations.
“Clearer guidance on the size of penalties could be useful in Australia to ensure penalties deter and that companies are aware of the likely size of fines.”
The OECD report says that in most OECD countries financial penalties are based on a set methodology which includes sales of the infringing company’s product. In Australia the penalties are determined by the Federal Court following an “instinctive synthesis” of various factors.