Smaller Pay Increases on the Horizon for Australians

By Bizclik Editor
  • Australian salaries to increase by an average of 3.5 percent across all industries in 2013 with a comparatively modest rise of 4.3 percent for Resource sector
  • Australians percentage pay increases were higher than UK, US and NZ, a trend that will continue into the coming year
  • Salaries in regional Western Australia are 21.9 percent higher than the market average
  • Living in expensive capital cities does not equate to higher wages – salaries for workers based in Melbourne, Brisbane and Adelaide are below the market average; Sydney workers earn the national average
  • Mining, Oil and Gas sectors have shown the greatest salary growth, with some roles commanding premiums of more than 30 percent above market average
  • Not-so-hot jobs are primarily in Call Centres, Merchandising, Education and Social Caring Work with pay levels between six and 16 percent below the market average

Australians expecting to receive a high pay increase in the new financial year could be disappointed according to a nation-wide survey of pay movements released today by global management consulting firm, Hay Group.

The 2013 Australian Salary Movement Index (ASMI) report has predicted the average pay increase for the coming 12 months across all sectors will be 3.5 percent. This is the slowest growth rate seen since the GFC, showing a sign of cautiousness within the Australian market.

During the past 12-month period, Hay Group observed that pay increases to fixed wages were fairly steady at 4.8 percent for the Resources sector, 4.3 percent for the Industrial and Service sector and 3.6 percent for the Financial industry.

Hay Group Senior Consultants and co-authors of the ASMI report, Steven Paola and Trevor Warden, believe the volatility impacting the Australian business environment has led to more austere pay increases. “The prevailing weaker business confidence has resulted in a more conservative approach to salary movements. Workers expecting increases to be similar or even higher than in recent years may be disappointed, and employers now need to think outside the ‘pay square’ when it comes to attracting, energising and retaining talent,” said Paola.

The most visible impact of this volatility has been the pay movements in the Resources sector. For the previous 12 months, Resource industries saw comparatively modest increases of 4.8 percent, a rate that is closer to the rest of the market. This slowing trajectory mirrors the weakening conditions in the Resources sector, impacted by the high Australian dollar; global uncertainty and the sharp fall in commodity prices. 

Just 12 months ago, the forecasted pay increase for the Resources sector was for 6.25 percent growth, illustrating just how quickly this sharp adjustment for the industry has occurred. For the coming year, Hay Group forecasts a salary growth of just 4.3 percent for the Resources sector.

Yet due to dramatic pay rises over recent years, many roles in Mining, Oil and Gas will continue to sit well above average in terms of actual pay levels for some time. This means that jobs in the Resources sector, particularly specialist technical roles and those in remote locations, continue to attract considerable pay premiums. Jobs in Mining Operations, Exploration and Petroleum Engineering currently command Total Annual Reward premiums 30 per cent above the market average.

As a result, the ‘hottest jobs’ in terms of pay growth can be found in Western Australia.  When compared to the national average salary, jobs in regional Western Australia earn 21.9 per cent higher (compared with 16.8 percent the previous year).

Meanwhile, jobs in regional Queensland earn a premium of just 3.4 percent in Total Annual Reward. This contrast with Western Australia may be attributed to the fact that Queensland mining jobs are located close to regional centres, rather than in remote parts of the State. For this reason, workers do not require such high wages as enticement to overcome geographic and social isolation.

Among the capital cities, Perth workers are the highest paid with a pay premium of 6.8 percent above the national average (this is up from 1.3 percent the previous year). By contrast, Sydney workers earn the national average salary, while Brisbane workers earn around 0.4 percent less than the national average. Melbourne workers earn salaries 3.1 percent lower than the market average with Adelaide sitting even further below at -3.2 percent. 

Taking a global view, Australian pay movements in 2012 were well ahead of other mature markets, in particular the US and UK where the challenging economic climate resulted in small movements of 1.5 percent in the US and marginally higher 1.7 percent in the UK. While countries such as the US and UK are beginning to recover and have predicted salary increases of 2.9 percent (US) and 2.7 percent (UK), they remain lower than Australia.

The report also reveals that bonuses are widely used to motivate and reward performance with around 62 percent of admin and operational roles and 85 percent of executives having a bonus component of some form within their total package.

Interestingly, actual bonus payout rates are below the set target across all employee groups – a trend that has been steady for some time. The Financial Services sector achieved the highest number of employees receiving a bonus with a rate of 82 percent (compared with 58 percent for other sectors).

“The pay packet is perhaps the most tangible way organisations can communicate what is valued, attract the best people, recognise employee contribution and motivate improvements. So it is vital not simply to set the bar correctly, but to continually monitor and adjust pay on an ongoing basis,” said Paola.

Given the relatively small increase in fixed annual reward that is forecasted for the coming quarters, retaining talent and incentivising performance through traditional pay-related measures may require a rethink.

“It is clear from this report that the market differs substantially across jobs, sectors and geography, hence organisations need to focus on understanding the market that they compete in and apply the appropriate monetary and non-monetary rewards that best fit,” explained Warden.

Paola and Warden recommend that organizations wishing to have higher engagement among employees and lower turnover should focus on getting these five fundamentals right >>>

  1. Confidence - In the organisation and its leadership, providing clear direction - line of sight - and support
  2. Development - Ensuring clear pathways for career development and progression are in place and communicated
  3. Selection - Ensure you are selecting the right people for the right job in order to maximise employee contribution and minimise turnover costs
  4. Reward - Fair (internal and external) recognition of both monetary and non-monetary methods, ensuring it’s a good fit for the organisation
  5. Enabling employees - Giving people what they need to do a good job, and an environment that is positive and one that fosters innovation and creativity

“Organisations needs to move beyond pay and focus on creating the right atmosphere with the right balance of monetary and non-monetary rewards to drive productivity, performance, engagement and loyalty,” recommends Warden.


Featured Articles

Nirvik Singh, COO Grey Group on adding colour to campaigns

Nirvik Singh, Global COO and President International of Grey Group, cultivating culture and utilising AI to enhance rather than replace human creativity

How Longi became the world’s leading solar tech manufacturer

On a mission to accelerate the adoption of sustainable energy solutions, US$30 billion Chinese tech firm Longi is not just selling solar – but using it

How Samsung’s US$5billion sustainability plan is working out

Armed with an ambitious billion-dollar strategy, Samsung is on track to achieve net zero carbon emissions company-wide by 2050 – but challenges persist

UOB: making strides in sustainability across Southeast Asia


Huawei smartwatch goes for gold with Ultimate Edition


How IKEA India plans to double business, triple headcount

Corporate Finance